<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teaching symbols to adults</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fweep2.edublogs.org/makaton-symbols/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fweep2.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>In the keyboard of life, always keep one finger on the escape key...and a hammer under your desk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:24:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fweep2</title>
		<link>http://fweep2.edublogs.org/makaton-symbols/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>fweep2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fweep2.edublogs.org/makaton-symbols/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Hi Judy, thanks for posting.  It&#039;s a tricky one, but i would probably go for Communicate in Print, (which is the newer version of writing in symbols), just because it has more flexibility at different ability levels than Boardmaker seems to.  I came across the Somerset symbols not long ago, and a great resource for people with learning difficulties using hospital services.  Its a shame that this isn&#039;t used consistently any more, as it was a very clear approach by the looks of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Judy, thanks for posting.  It&#8217;s a tricky one, but i would probably go for Communicate in Print, (which is the newer version of writing in symbols), just because it has more flexibility at different ability levels than Boardmaker seems to.  I came across the Somerset symbols not long ago, and a great resource for people with learning difficulties using hospital services.  Its a shame that this isn&#8217;t used consistently any more, as it was a very clear approach by the looks of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Valentine</title>
		<link>http://fweep2.edublogs.org/makaton-symbols/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Valentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fweep2.edublogs.org/makaton-symbols/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>When I taught in F.E  in Somerset it was clear. We used STC, Somerset Total Communication ,a signs and symbols system  using  Writing with Symbols  from Widgit . This was used by  Adult Learning Disability Services and I believe the schools. Now in West Sussex there dooesn&#039;t seem to be any clear direction. The local special school uses Boardmaker, we have Writing with Symbols from Widgit  but don&#039;t use it .
I would like us to buy  the colour Communicate in Print
Which is best Boardmaker or Communicate in Print?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I taught in F.E  in Somerset it was clear. We used STC, Somerset Total Communication ,a signs and symbols system  using  Writing with Symbols  from Widgit . This was used by  Adult Learning Disability Services and I believe the schools. Now in West Sussex there dooesn&#8217;t seem to be any clear direction. The local special school uses Boardmaker, we have Writing with Symbols from Widgit  but don&#8217;t use it .<br />
I would like us to buy  the colour Communicate in Print<br />
Which is best Boardmaker or Communicate in Print?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
